Related News Articles

06/30/2015

A not-so-complimentary NY Times hands-on review of the AARP RealPad.

06/30/2015

Using the new feature is as easy as saying "Alexa, read [book title]."

06/29/2015

Creating a dementia caregiver ecosystem -- possibly underpinned with technology that includes the caregiver.

06/26/2015

Maine is the oldest state in the nation -- thus research on tech for seniors.

06/26/2015

Development, validation, commercialization, dissemination, adoption of products & services.

Market Research Reports

Updated: (01-29-2015) Technology Market Overview Report Click here

Published: (06-20-2014) Challenging Innovators 2014 Report Click here

Published (03-08-2013) Next Generation Response Systems Click here

Updated (8-25-2012) Aging and Health Technology Report Click here

Updated (7-31-2012) The Future of Home Care Technology Click here

Published (2-14-2012) Linkage Technology Survey Age 65-100 Report Click here

Published (4-29-2011) Connected Living for Social Aging Report Click here

Meet Laurie in one of the following places:

Boston, MA, June 16 - July 7, 2015

Washington, DC, July 20, 2015

Health 2.0, Santa Clara, CA, October, 2015

 

You are here

Let's push back on tech’s ‘new wave’ driven by data

About those ad words – can we outsmart them?  Just read an approving and syndicated Times article about the latest data-driven tech that uses what we access online to present us with more of the same. Given my predilection to write e-mails about the age-related technology space, the all-knowing Google regularly presents me with ads for products based on the messages I send and receive. Some ads are for vendors who are my clients, none of them are my suppliers.  As is typical, I don’t notice for a while and then – in a flash, out of the corner of my eye, I see – duh, there’s a pattern here.  So I do what you all should do regularly – tell Google these not only aren’t relevant, YOU are not who they think you are, you are someone else.  You can opt out – but, sigh, "Google may still show relevant ads based on the content of a web page" that you are viewing. But it will not ‘collect’ your interest-based information to show you more relevant content. Whew. By looking at your ads preference manager page, you can, however, change your demographic profile – making yourself older/younger than you actually are (or what Google thinks you are). This may be a wise move.

The new data-driven wave – what are the downsides? Netflix is a good example of a site that thinks it knows you and regularly makes recommendations based on what you’ve watched – if you have eclectic taste, let’s just say that following those recommendations might be downright silly. I watched a documentary one day about Scrabble competitions, so naturally, I should be shown a preference for a movie about people who dress up like superheros. Of course.  Like Google and the healthcare sector, Netflix is watching your behaviors, and – as with Google – you can end-run it, override and go look for something that it does not recommend that you see. But alas, turns out that you aren't so smart. Says Netflix, "three-quarters of what people watch now come from such recommendations." Let's follow that logic to Google Ads, travel and restaurant recommendations, Amazon book suggestions, etc. So our world gradually becomes a narrowing set of concentric interest circles that we break out of only 25% of the time. It’s one thing to make a restaurant recommendation based on where you’re standing. It’s quite another to make assumptions about what you want to eat based on where you ate before, what you want to read, buy, etc, based on what you read or bought.

As the population ages, what seemed useful may become worrisome narrow-casting. Beyond obnoxious, the trend of using data-sifting software that is 'helping' us find what we would most want to know is a nightmare-to-be. It can shut our unwitting selves off from knowing new ideas, finding new contacts, grasping concepts or making purchases that are in opposition to our shopping and movie-watching patterns. We are entering a world in which browsing physical book collections is obsolete -- and the 'world’s largest bookstore' is too big to browse anyway. Though whether it is a monopoly seems only in reference to price, not so far, in terms of selection, which is a genuine crowd-think problem. So you like an author? How about seeing what everyone likes who also liked that author?  If you agree, you reinforce the data-driven assumption that you really aren't open to anything new. Now, recognizing that your own personal data is leaving town along with your preferences, startups are emerging that help you lock it up to be shared only with those you trust. Nice. Protecting your search privacy is not the default, it now requires deliberate action and vigilance.

Bring back rebellion – opt out online and avoid superficial preference-based stereotypes.  Why? This reminds me of those long-ago radical moments when my peers and I would march around believing ourselves to be quite unique, outside the culture and politics of the time, wearing our opt-out, tune-out clothing and hairstyles, bathed in the glow of smug, and in reality, just like everyone else. (How funny, this time is now preserved on Wikipedia!) Perhaps in our later decades, we should try another form of protest -- this time, online – saying no, that’s not who we are, that's not what we think, that's not what we’ll buy or where we’ll eat. We want to do something different today. You have it wrong – now get lost -- go profile someone else.

Comments

I use Mozilla Firefox for my browser. They have an app which you can download for free that absolutely blocks all ads when you are on the Internet. Free at last!!

Thanks, anonymous, but Adblock notoriously screws up some other functions on some websites which is what happened to me using Firefox. So since I prefer that browser, I had to uninstall Adblock and anyway, it doesn't block recommendations such as on Netflix or Amazon, etc. as Laurie mentions or at other websites.

I generally don't notice online advertising but recently it has become hilariously evident that the results of all this data collection is beyond stupid. What has caught my attention in the past few weeks are the repeated ads - cascades of them everywhere I travel online - for products I just bought from the stores where I bought those products. Why, if I just purchased a bathroom scale, do they think I want another? Why do they try to sell me the same shoes in the same color I just bought?

It also leaves one to wonder how much extra we pay for goods because the stores are paying so much money to services/agencies that do such a bad job of handling their advertising? Plus, do they understand what idiots they look like to customers? I don't suppose I would refuse to shop with them next time just because they engage in stupid advertising, but their reputation drops quite a few points when I see those redundant ads.

But all that is just irritatingly amusing (or vice versa). What is a real concern is this:

"So our world gradually becomes a narrowing set of concentric interest circles that we break out of only 25% of the time. It’s one thing to make a restaurant recommendation based on where you’re standing. It’s quite another to make assumptions about what you want to eat based on where you ate before, what you want to read, buy, etc, based on what you read or bought."

Just one more effect piled on so many others that isolate us into narrow-interest silos which has terrible political and social consequences locally, nationally and globally.

Thanks for those services to lock up personal information. I'll check them out but I suspect it will take so much time to organize and maintain that it is more effort and commitment than I want to make (being perfectly aware that that means big brother wins.)

User login

login account