Hear Laurie in one of the following:

2024 What's Next Longevity Venture Summit (online)

2024 Longevity Venture Summit (DC)

Related News Articles


AI holds significant promise in alleviating the pressures felt by healthcare facilities worldwide.


But if these devices are so smart, why can’t they talk to each other?


 37% of senior living properties recognized by A Place for Mom cited for “serious violations affecting resident care.”


The ability to detect subtle changes in body movements averts potential health issues.


Cost of staffing keeps prices high.

Monthly blog archive

You are here

Technology for seniors – many surveys, what can we learn?

There is a survey echo in here.  Rant on. In listening to a presentation yesterday, I was struck by the similarity of the content between what older adults want from technology (now), what an older version of responders told the Linkage Technology Survey of 2011, versus Healthy@Home 2008 versus...pick a survey, any survey. Older adults aged 60 and beyond, including the 75+ age range that previous posts have designated as the Real Senior, want to stay in their own home.  Okay.  They are interested in some technologies that would be enablers. Okay. They perceive those technologies that they do not yet have as possibly too costly. Developers are concerned about building technology into new homes for fear of it becoming obsolete.  In conclusion, older adults appear to be unaware of the technologies that could be enablers for remaining longer in their homes -- and they will not remodel specifically to get them.

Seniors don’t like or feel comfortable with the tech that exists.  Never mind what new technology should be designed or how cool the design can be. Never mind that it can be made more/less obtrusive, more/less functional, more/less mobile, that their homes could be more automated and smart.  Let us just STOP for a moment and ask:  Who really understands why the current tech offerings in the market are not being seized by the population that could benefit from their use? What is the gap?  We are staring at growing chasms – they yawn between the makers and the users of technology, and truthfully, between the expert advisors and the makers.

A theory: Customization and flexibility are creating the chasm.  As we march forward in this inexorable technology road trip, product demos are all around.  For your new easy-to-use tablet or smartphone, here’s how you change the settings, the brightness, the icon size, the font, the memory, browser settings, the applications, the features, the case choices. Who are your contacts, what are your most relevant apps, how do you keep your devices secure and up-to-date from easy attack by predators who want to steal something you value? We have lost the Levittown simplicity of homes (rooms into which you put a limited amount of furniture, plus a phone on the wall with a long cord). And we have lost the Atari simplicity of technology – turn it on and the game is ready to go.  Consider today’s complexity of the coffee maker, temperature control settings, connecting a TV to the Internet, the dashboard of a newer car, the TV remote, Netflix profiles configuration, out-of-the-box setup of a new tablet, and on and on.

We the consumers have enabled the makers to run amok.  While on the positive side, plugs and connectors are increasingly standard, what they connect to is becoming more feature-rich, and thus more customizable and complex to remove from the box and actually use. Because some of the consumers buy these gadgets and gear that is on the market, it is presumed that these must be the right gadgets, designed for all people, even though some in the ‘all people’ may be reduced to a state of frustrated and overwhelmed fear and a sense of creeping incompetence. But for the product maker, the goal was met – that gadget/car/tablet/phone sold, so let’s tweak the features and make more of those things. Who are those consumers? What percent of devices are returned? Who guides on features and function?  Who leads?  Who integrates? Who are the guides that can help us through this thicket of complexity -- in the name of customization and flexibility?   Rant off.



Seniors by an overwhelm majority want to age at home and plan to do it.

Seniors by an overwhelming majority also want to be:

Disease free

Strong and agile

Sharp as a tack

Financially secure

Free of conflict

With an active sex life

And these issues are also part of their plan.

Wanting and wishing doesn’t always work out. In fact if it did, all of us in the eldercare field would have no business at all. So perhaps we should be designing our businesses and making plans for the realities of aging and not for the wishes of the aging.

There is another point about Real Seniors.  The word needs to be on a sliding scale based on the age of the user of the phrase.

Real Seniors according to age group using the phrase is as follows:

0 to 20 = over 30

20 to 40 = over 60

40 to 50 = over 65

50 to 60 = over 70

60 to 70 = over 85

70 to 80 = over 95

80 and up = What are we talking about?

John Boden


Your comments are very valid in that seniors want simple and manufacturers keep adding bells and whistles. However, to me an even bigger problem is cost. I would love to have som of the gadgets I read about that will help keep me independent, but I simply can't afford them.


login account